Impasse has a surprising number of twists and turns in the logic.
And I can add a comment in this thread too, but I have to REPLY to someone other than TiG (who impassed me)
I can add another comment in this thread, but I cannot reply to Groucho since I IMPASSED him
I am currently free of IMPASSE restrictions
Replying to Harpo given no IMPASSE restriction for him
Able to REPLY to Groucho since there is no IMPASSE in this sub-thread
A new main thread
No IMPASSE in this new main thread. Cannot REPLY to Groucho in a 1.x comment, but am free in the 2.x comments.
Unable to IMPASSE Groucho since I had the last word
But I was able to IMPASSE TiG since he had the last word. Now we cannot reply to each other in 2.x comments
New Main Thread
I impassed Groucho at @1.1 even though this is my first comment!
However, it is notable that on the thread I am impassed with Groucho, but on the new thread I am able to discuss with it. It works!
Suggestion: I think some threads will need ability to IMPASSE more than a one-time limit. Just saying! Or, the feature can be 'lifted' and 'scuffled about.' That, might work.
I think some threads will need ability to IMPASSE more than a one-time limit.
Agreed. That is configurable so if Perrie finds the need she can change the limit.
Tig, I just IMPASSED all three commenters @ 1 thread without commenting there.
Yeah the rule that prevented that was inadvertently mitigated by a subsequent change. Fixed.