Final Testing for Impasse

  
By:  tig  •  last year  •  18 comments

Final Testing for Impasse
Excellent graphical depiction of impasse

Impasse has a surprising number of twists and turns in the logic.


Tags

jrDiscussion - asc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
TiG
1  author  TiG    last year

Opening comment

 
 
 
Groucho
1.1  Groucho  replied to  TiG @1    last year

Hey!

 
 
 
Groucho
1.1.1  Groucho  replied to  Groucho @1.1    last year

And I can add a comment in this thread too, but I have to REPLY to someone other than TiG (who impassed me)

 
 
 
Harpo
1.1.2  Harpo  replied to  Groucho @1.1    last year

What's happening?

 
 
 
TiG
1.2  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1    last year

I can add another comment in this thread, but I cannot reply to Groucho since I IMPASSED him

 
 
 
Harpo
1.3  Harpo  replied to  TiG @1    last year

I am currently free of IMPASSE restrictions

 
 
 
Groucho
1.3.1  Groucho  replied to  Harpo @1.3    last year

Replying to Harpo given no IMPASSE restriction for him

 
 
 
TiG
1.3.2  author  TiG  replied to  Groucho @1.3.1    last year

Able to REPLY to Groucho since there is no IMPASSE in this sub-thread

 
 
 
Groucho
2  Groucho    last year

A new main thread

 
 
 
TiG
2.1  author  TiG  replied to  Groucho @2    last year

No IMPASSE in this new main thread.   Cannot REPLY to Groucho in a 1.x comment, but am free in the 2.x comments.

 
 
 
TiG
2.2  author  TiG  replied to  Groucho @2    last year

Unable to IMPASSE Groucho since I had the last word

 
 
 
Groucho
2.3  Groucho  replied to  Groucho @2    last year

But I was able to IMPASSE TiG since he had the last word.   Now we cannot reply to each other in 2.x comments

 
 
 
Groucho
3  Groucho    last year

New Main Thread

 
 
 
cb
4  cb    last year

I impassed Groucho at @1.1 even though this is my first comment!

However, it is notable that on the thread I am impassed with Groucho, but on the new thread I am able to discuss with it. It works!

 
 
 
cb
5  cb    last year

Suggestion: I think some threads will need ability to IMPASSE more than a one-time limit. Just saying! Or, the feature can be 'lifted' and 'scuffled about.'  That, might work.

 
 
 
TiG
5.1  author  TiG  replied to  cb @5    last year
I think some threads will need ability to IMPASSE more than a one-time limit.

Agreed.  That is configurable so if Perrie finds the need she can change the limit.

 
 
 
cb
6  cb    last year

Tig, I just IMPASSED all three commenters @ 1 thread without commenting there.

 
 
 
TiG
6.1  author  TiG  replied to  cb @6    last year

Yeah the rule that prevented that was inadvertently mitigated by a subsequent change.   Fixed.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online