<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Group Discussion]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
        <link>http://betathenewstalkerscom.jamroomhosting.com/feed/group_discuss</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:06:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="http://betathenewstalkerscom.jamroomhosting.com/feed/group_discuss/limit=100/discuss_group_id=7" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Errant Bible: Who could claim otherwise? - @tig]]></title>
                <link>http://betathenewstalkerscom.jamroomhosting.com/tig/group_discuss/19/who-could-claim-otherwise</link>
                <guid>http://betathenewstalkerscom.jamroomhosting.com/tig/group_discuss/19</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<br><br>
 Proving biblical inerrancy or errancy:<br><br>
  As described elsewhere on this site , Proving biblical inerrancy or errancy appears to be impossible. Ultimately, these beliefs must be accepted on faith. However, if      proofs      are not available, at least we might be able to derive some      indicators      of inerrancy or errancy. The most promising route may be to study themes and general topics seen throughout the Bible.<br>
 We have examined twelve themes. The four described below seem to indicate (but not prove) that the Bible is errant.    Five additional themes    also indicate biblical errancy.     Three are inconclusive . None seem to support inerrancy at this time. If any reader knows an additional theme that might indicate or prove errancy or inerrancy, please    E-mail    us.<br>
 xxx]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 21:05:09 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>